tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5528158760608808912.post3092631086686532846..comments2024-03-28T09:59:14.226-04:00Comments on AS BEREANS DID: Nailed To The CrossMarthahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12438486498450616814noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5528158760608808912.post-8378547208977977192010-10-25T18:30:16.466-04:002010-10-25T18:30:16.466-04:00In his article "Is All Animal flesh Good for ...In his article "<a href="http://www.herbert-armstrong.org/Plain%20Truth%201950s/Plain%20Truth%201958%20(Vol%20XXIII%20No%2002)%20Feb.pdf" rel="nofollow">Is All Animal flesh Good for Food?</a>", Herbert Armstrong taught that the,<br />"ceremonial, ritualistic, or sacrificial laws," were, "later abolished at the crucifixion of Christ."<br /><br />That should settle that, right? Who are his followers to argue with their Apostle?<br />-Herbert Armstrong, Plain Truth magazine, Feb. 1958, p. 10xHWAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01061716053302210598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5528158760608808912.post-63639370077549024902010-10-25T12:18:05.839-04:002010-10-25T12:18:05.839-04:00On 10-25-2010 at roughly noon I made an alteration...On 10-25-2010 at roughly noon I made an alteration to this post in the section about "law of ordinances." So, if you haven't read this since before that time, please read it again.<br /><br />It occurred to me that über-legalists were not convinced, and I hadn't made the point strongly enough. I added a reference to Ephesians 2 and reworded a few things so that when they say I don't understand cheirographon, their bias will be evident to you.xHWAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01061716053302210598noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5528158760608808912.post-3381732811957240992010-10-18T09:10:17.465-04:002010-10-18T09:10:17.465-04:00Like a credit card, law-keeping incurs debt. Jesus...Like a credit card, law-keeping incurs debt. Jesus paid our debt. Legalists claim, "But we still must keep the law" (which they don't keep).<br /><br />What sense does it make that Jesus would give us a credit card, we rack up an incalculable amount of debt, He pays it off, and then He says, "I want you to keep using this credit card, or you're in deep trouble!"<br />It makes NO sense!<br /><br />Every time a law is broken, debt piles up. What sense does it make that Jesus would pay the debt but leave the ability to get into debt again? Not only leaving the credit card lying around, but supposedly commanding us to use it?<br />It makes NO sense!<br /><br />So He pays our debt, we rack up more, and He pays that, and we rack up more, and He pays that too, etc.?<br />Ridiculous!<br />God is a God of curing diseases, not masking symptoms.xHWAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01061716053302210598noreply@blogger.com