In this post we will be looking for answers to the question: How do we know what covenant we are keeping? What does the NC consist of?
The OC and the Ten Commandments
Would you say the Ten Commandments are part of the NC? Was God’s NC identical to the OC but with the ceremonies and sacrifices omitted? What is the NC?
We know the Ten Commandments were part of the OC.
De. 4:13 He declared to you his covenant, the Ten Commandments…
If they are not part of the NC, does that mean it is okay to murder, steal, lie, etc?, of course not. Here’s what Paul had to say on the matter;
Ro. 5:20 The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more,
Remember, this Covenant did not even exist in Abraham’s day. It came about, 430 years after Abraham time (Ga. 3:17).
21 so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Ro. 6:1 What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase? 2 By no means! We died to sin; how can we live in it any longer? 3 Or don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.
From ‘Going Through the Motions’ to ‘Attitude’
Under the OC one just needed to go through the motions regardless of attitude, but not so with the NC, it, very much, matters what is in the heart. Here is what Jesus says;
Mt.5:21 "You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.' [OC; Just about actions]
22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. [NC: All about attitude, about what’s in the heart.]
Was the NC written just like the OC only with the ceremonies and sacrifices removed? Based on these scriptures, the answer is ‘no’.
God said he would make a new covenant, and he said it would not be like the old one.
Jer. 31:31 "The time is coming," declares the LORD,
"when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah.
32 It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
because they broke my covenant,
though I was a husband to them, "
declares the LORD.
How would this covenant be different?
33 "This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time," declares the LORD. [OC; all about actions, not the heart]
"I will put my law in their minds
and write it on their hearts. [All about attitude/what’s in the heart]
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
What was wrong with the fist one?
Heb.8:7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant,
no place would have been sought for another.
2 Cor 3:7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone…
9 If the ministry that condemns men…
13 We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to keep the Israelites from gazing at it while the radiance was fading away.
14 But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away.
15 Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts.
What Does the OC Consist Of?
Jesus said;
Mt.5:17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. [And he did]
V18 I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. [It was accomplished, finished, fulfilled.]
The OC, (that which was engraved in stone), brought death. It condemns men. Unlike the NC, it doesn’t last, it had an expiration date. Paul said;
2 Cor 3:7 Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though it was, 8 will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? 9 If the ministry that condemns men is glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! 10 For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. 11 And if what was fading away came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts! 12 Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold.
13 We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to keep the Israelites from gazing at it while the radiance was fading away. 14 But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. 15 Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. 16 But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. 18 And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.
Again, what was the OC? What did it consist of?
Deuteronomy 4:13 He declared to you his covenant, the Ten Commandments…
So What Does the NC Consist Of?
Look at what Jesus says in the Beatitudes. Here, he shows the difference between the OC and the NC.
Murder
Mt.5:21 "You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.' [OC; Just about actions]
22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. [NC: All about attitude, about what’s in the heart.]
Adultery
V27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery,’
V28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart…
V31 “It has been said, ’Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’
V32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her become and adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
Oaths
V33 “Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.’
V34 But I tell you, Do not sweat at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne;
V35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King.
V36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black.
V37 Simply let you ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes’ and you ‘No,’ ‘No’, anything beyond this comes from the evil one.
An Eye for an Eye
V38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’
V39 But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
V40 And if someone wants to sue you and take you tunic, let him have your cloak as well.
V41 If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
V42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
Love for Enemies
V43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love you neighbor and hate your enemy.’
V44 But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
V45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sum t rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
V46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that?
V47 And if you greet only your brothers, what are doing more that others? Do not even pagans do that?
V48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
He goes on to cover Giving to the Needy, Prayer and Fasting, Seeking the Kingdom, Worry, and Judging Others.
Jesus shows how the OC falls short in Mt.5 and 23;
Mt. 5:20 For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
In the OC it was about going through the motions. But Jesus talked about the difference between the OC and the NC. He talked about how the teachers of the law and the Pharisees kept the law, yet were filthy on the inside.
We learn in Mt. 5 and 23, that there was something wrong with the OC; (Heb.8:7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.)
Jesus tells how the OC whitewashes the OUTSIDE, leaving the inside full of dead men’s bones. He talks about what does matter; the INSIDE and that cleansing comes only through Christ.
We learn from him and Paul in Mt.22:37-40 and Ro. 12:10 that Love is the law, that love is the fulfillment of the law, and that the law and the prophets hang on love. But remember, the OC cannot gain you the kingdom.
Once, again, the OC included the 10 Commandments;
Deuteronomy 4:13 He declared to you his covenant, the Ten Commandments…
Again, I ask: Was the NC written just like the OC only with the ceremonies and sacrifices removed? Based on these scriptures, the answer is ‘no’.
God said he would make a new covenant, and he said it would not be like the old one.
Jer. 31:31 "The time is coming," declares the LORD,
"when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah.
32 It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers…"
declares the LORD.
And again: How would this covenant be different?
33 "This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time," declares the LORD. [OC; all about actions, not the heart]
"I will put my law in their minds
and write it on their hearts. [All about attitude, what’s in the heart]
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
So, which covenant are you keeping?
I’m sure this ‘curfew’ analogy is getting old, but again, let’s look at it;
Teen ‘A’ has been given a 6PM curfew because he continually came home after 2 or 3 in the morning. Teen ‘B’ was never given a curfew because he was always home before 8PM. Six months later the curfew if lifted from teen ‘A.’
Here is my question; does teen ‘A’ need to continue coming home at 6PM, or can he come home any time he chooses as long as it is an appropriate time?
9 comments:
"V18 - I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law (Torah/Teachings of Moses) until everything is accomplished. [It was accomplished, finished, fulfilled.]"
"Until everything accomplished" is an ancient Jewish concept. It was hoary and time-honored by the time Jesus walked the earth. It resonated meaningfully with those in his audience.
The phrase looks forward to a time in the distant future when Torah will have so thoroughly permeated everything and everyone that the unity described in the Sh'ma will have engulfed God, Torah, Israel, the nations, the heavenly hosts and the universe. Jesus went so far as to suggest that "heaven and earth" will have disappeared by then -- which makes it a huge stretch to suggest that everything has already been accomplished.
Jesus didn't do it all. He was just one brilliant, and according to the NT, royal Jew. He urged his followers to take up their crosses and follow him. Why should they have bothered, had Jesus intended to do everything on his own?
All Israel is one fellowship, with every Israelite responsible for him or herself plus the rest of the family. Nobody, including Jesus, does everything on his or her own. We're a family; we work, play, suffer, fight, win and rejoice together.
As for now, everything has not been accomplished, but we should all be working in that direction.
For the purpose of illustration, I'm choosing the matter of lust for a woman constituting adultery for a man. Hopefully this one example will help to provide context for the other quotes you have published here.
One should keep in mind that in the gospels Jesus is an observant Jew, speaking to other serious Jews at a time when the Pharisees had received responsibility to legislate Jewish law. Even the Temple priests had no choice but to adhere to the authority of the Pharisees, who had the hearts of the people and occupied Moses' seat.
In this context the person being discussed is a "woman," which means a married female. Adultery is formally defined as sex with another man's wife. Many other sexual sins exist, but they aren't defined as adultery. In this context, lust is simply desire, and when the one desired is married to another, the process of adultery is already underway. This understanding was well established centuries before Jesus was born. Jesus' teachings were mainstream Judaism.
Desire ("lust" in KJV) for a single girl, a maiden, should normally lead to marriage if the other variables are amenable. If there were no desire there would be no marriages. The status of the desired one defines whether or not the desire is adulterous. In King James English, lust is encouraged when the thing lusted for is strong drink during the feast of Succot (Tabernacles or Booths). Once again, the thing lusted after defines the rightness or wrongness of the action.
Of course there are all shades of grey in these matters, and desire for an available single woman can also lead to sin -- but not to adultery. In Jesus' environment there was no way for a man to commit adultery with a single girl. They might have done other extremely sinful sexual things, but lacking another's wife, the sin is not "adultery." The same law governs Jews today.
I mention these things to show that Jesus was not pulling new teachings out of the sky to create a new way of life. He was explaining Jewish law to his students at a time when Jewish law was in a state of flux, while differing viewpoints raged between the students of Hillel and Shammai. This was about 40 years before the Temple would be destroyed and Rabbinical Judaism would have to take over in exile.
Everything Jesus has to say should be viewed in terms of his context. He wasn't pulling sermon notes out of a "New Testament" in his head. He was explaining Jewish law in a Jewish context to Jewish students, all of whom were required by Jesus himself to carefully obey Jewish law (Matt. 23:1-3).
The New Covenant is nothing new. It is a reNEWwal, in Israelite hearts, of the only Torah that will ever exist, whose only fault was in the family of Israel (Jer. 31:31-34, Heb. 8:8). King David recognized the Torah as "perfect, converting the soul," and Jesus said that the universe could evaporate more easily than the Torah could lose even a tiny yod, or a crown on a letter. One cannot do better than conform to a perfect Torah.
I am not a proponent of the New Testament as a thoroughly inerrant collection of inspired writings. It isn't. It has suffered much lamentable compromise over the years, but it still contains knowledge of and from the first century CE that can be found nowhere else. When its teachings ring true with Torah, then it too is absolutely perfect (Isa. 8:20).
Smilin Jack,
Zec.12: 10 "And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son.
Seeker, I don't care at all who the ultimate Messiah proves to be. If he is Jesus, then Baruch HaShem. If he is another, Baruch HaShem as well -- just so long as he comes.
I hold the historical Jesus, insofar as I have been able to discover him, in great and fond admiration. Unfortunately, finding him under all the creative falderal that has been added to the record is no mean task.
I will look carefully into the passage you've given me, and we'll go from there. Gut Shabbos.
Smilin Jack,
Clearly there is a vast separation between Jews and Christians.
We believe when Jesus said "I am the way, the truth and the life" that he spoke with authority.
If the Jews could have produced the body of the crusified Jesus, the debate would have ended two thousand years ago. The rise of belief in Jesus as the fulfilment of the prophecies of the suffering Messiah would have died on the vine. No one would have bothered to suffer persecution and death for a dillusion. If the disciples had stolen his body, they would not have chosen to suffer for that lie.
Many Jews saw miracles and wouldn't believe. I don't expect anything I could say, could top the acts of Jesus.
Smilinjacksprat,
we clearly have different beliefs, you being Jewish & me being Christian.
I'm not sure what your purpose here is.
Are you here to convince me of something, or are you just curious, or are you perhaps exploring possibilities in truth?
If you prefer, you can e-mail me, link is on the right of my main page.
Seeker, I'm explaining some of the Jewish concepts you've presented from a Jewish point of view, since that was Jesus' perspective and that of his students. Is this not a reflection of the Berean example? I think this explanation makes good sense. You be the judge.
In your blog you asked a question, but answered it incompletely with a partial quote of Hebrews 8:7. Was this intentional?
You wrote, "What was wrong with the first one [covenant]? For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another."
At that point you skipped to 2 Corinthians, and later to Jesus' statement that suggests to many that he vicariously fulfilled the "Law" in our stead, thereby paving the way for a different lifestyle based on a vastly different "new" covenant. But you should have continued quoting Hebrews, which is a paraphrase of Jeremiah 31 -- because Hebrews and Jeremiah precisely define the fault of the first covenant.
There is no suggestion in either of these passages that the "old" covenant wording or requirements are in any way different from or inferior to the new. The fault of the earlier covenant was not in its terms, but in the weakness and shoddy conduct of the children of Israel. That's what it says both in Jeremiah and Hebrews. "For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. But God found fault with the PEOPLE...."
The New Covenant, based on the perfect Torah of Moses, will reside in the HEARTS of the children of Israel and Judah. That's the improvement God and Jeremiah were looking forward to. That's what it says in both places, although Hebrews misquotes Jeremiah, saying "laws" rather than the singular,"law," which in Hebrew is Torah, meaning "Teaching," or "Instruction." There is only one Torah.
"This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time," declares the LORD. I will put my law [Torah] in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people."
Sorry Jack,
I'll respond ASAP.
SmilinJack,
My response is a bit long, so I'm going to post it on the main page...
Post a Comment