Monday, August 26, 2024

Roman Legions

Just a short post today to show you something interesting.

I found this image online. I haven't had the desire to really verify if it is accurate. Take a look.

What it claims to show are the areas of the Roman Empire with a count of the number of legions assigned to secure those areas. Four legions here. Eight legions there. That's a lot of legions!

And I can't believe they coordinated that whole thing without any high-speed communications.

I really am not so much interested in the precise accuracy of the thing. I am more interested in something Jesus said.

It is well after sundown after the Last Supper. Jesus and His remaining companions had retired to the Mount of Olives. Judas had finalized His betrayal. A group of men had arrived to arrest Jesus. John 18 tells us Peter cuts off the ear of the High Priest's servant. Jesus restores the man. Then, Jesus says this:

(MAT. 22: 52-56) 52 But Jesus said to him, “Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword. 53 Or do you think that I cannot now pray to My Father, and He will provide Me with more than twelve legions of angels? 54 How then could the Scriptures be fulfilled, that it must happen thus?”

Twelve legions was more than any area of Rome had. It was well more than Judea had.

As an side, there is Jesus, talking again about how He was committed to keeping His covenant and fulfilling the prophets. Just like we saw in the post "One Jot or One Tittle".

That graphic claims to be for the second century. I understand Rome only had about 28 legions at the time Jesus was arrested. Jesus was saying the Father would send Him half the Roman army.

When I looked it up, the number of men in a legion is anywhere from 5,000 to 6,000 men. Let's go with that lower number. When we take 12 legions, multiplied by 5,000, we get 60,000. That's a lot of angels! If you think about it, one angel would have done the trick. We have no defense at all against them. When the singular angel of death visited Egypt, they were completely helpless. (Whether that angel was Yahweh Himself is not important right now.) I think the number Jesus mentioned was specifically to make a point.

I just thought this was interesting.



************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************

12 comments:

  1. I'd like to apologise for any upset, distress and any offence I have caused with my recent comment on this blog.
    I don't pull my punches and I didn't consider any after affects. So I offer a genuine unreserved apology.

    Whilst I don't agree with the blog I have gone about things wrongly, in a brutal war fighting mode and I apologise for that as well.

    I have thought over the past few days to try and offer an apology. I hope I'm not making matters worse.

    I would appreciate and welcome peace.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Impressive. Takes a big person to apologize like you have. I appreciate this.

    Apology accepted.

    We can agree to disagree. All this blog has ever asked is for people to give us a fair trial. If you still don't agree with our conclusions, you are free to do so. We both tried. Now, let's live in peace.

    If you would like to try your comment/question again in a better tone, I welcome that. We could discuss your thoughts in a peaceful way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for your magnanimous reply at 6:22.
    Many thanks for accepting my apology.

    Philippians 3:13-14

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous,

    I am not going to post your last comment. I haven't heard from you in weeks. I show up and have a random comment about how I've carried out some premeditated attack on you. Care to let me in on why you are so very upset?
    Did you make some comment I didn't respond to? Or, is this about how you said buying Chinese goods is the same as Armstrong buying the Tsar's gold flatware, and I disagreed with that because you buy Chinese goods, too?
    What's got you so angry?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh I wasn't aware my comments had come across that way. Perhaps you could be more specific.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps I am dealing with more than one "Anonymous" commentors. The anonymous my comment was directed towards was 11/18/2024, 4:22 AM.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No thats me. I'm not angry. I've made my opinion very clear.

      Delete
    2. Indeed you did. Care to help me understand what exactly prompted you to have such an opinion?

      Delete
    3. I didn't do anything at all on the 9th that I recall. I don't see any comments that came in, or replies that I posted, or new articles. I did get an email on that date but I replied two days later.
      The only thing I can think of that would have upset anyone is that I disagreed on the buying Chinese goods equal to Herbie's gold flatware, but that was on the 1st not the 9th. But I wasn't rude or even harsh about it.

      Delete
    4. Playing mind games. Goodbye.

      Delete
    5. So, you say - against Christmas - that buying gifts is the same as Herbie buying the golden flatware, and I point out it's not a Christmas-specific thing and you do it, too, then you go off on me that I launched an abusive pre-meditated attack on you and didn't provide a Bible verse -- and that's me playing games??? It's an unsupportable point. And how do I give a Bible verse in response to a comment that wasn't Bible-specific to begin with?

      I never promised you I would agree with you. I just said we can have civil disagreements. And it was civil ...from me. You are the one who went off on me.
      (Sweet mother of mercy this reminds me of Aggie.)

      Delete