Sin

Violating the law is the not the definition of sin. Sin is the fruit of an evil heart.

---

(1 John 3:4) Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

When properly parsed, a transgression of the law results when one sins. This does not define sin. It tells you what sin does; the result of sin.

By removing the first half of the verse, an entirely different interpretation is drawn out of the now truncated passage, so that a desired conclusion is achieved, where sin is the result of transgressing the law; the exact opposite conclusion of the verse when the whole of it is examined.

Sin becomes defined by the transgression of the law, where the very meaning of the Greek word translated into the English word “sin”, that defines sin, is ignored entirely. The definition of sin, derived from the Greek word for sin, gets lost in the legalistic shuffle.

Sin is translated from the Greek “hamartia” and refers to missing the mark in relation to the glory of God.

(Romans 3:23) For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God 

Why is this distinction important?

For one thing, it demonstrates the pervasiveness of sin in relation to a specific subset of mankind.

For another thing, it disassociates sin from what it really is - missing this mark related to the glory of God - and shifts it to something else entirely; that being strictly and solely any transgression of the law. This improper definition allows the legalist to ignore the parts of the law that required a proper, legal examination of any transgression of the law in order to determine if a transgression had any legal justification for having done so.

(John 7:51) Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?

The fact that there were legal justifications for breaking the law means that sin cannot simply be any violation of the law. The Sanhedrin dodged this legal requirement out of hand. Today’s legalist just redefines sin so as to exclude any trial that might exonerate the one who transgressed the law, with a legal justification for having done so, where a transgression of the law automatically results in a charge of sin, without appeal.

(Matthew 12:36-37) But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

Imagine the scenario playing out where those who insist sin is the result of transgressing the law standing before God who asks them why they condemned others of sin without a hearing, like they will find themselves standing before God, having a hearing they denied others? I would be interested in seeing how they “talk” their way out of that...

Who all has “missed the mark” in relation to the “glory of God?” Everyone! Whether they be under the law of the old covenant or not under the law of the old covenant.

(Romans 2:12) For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;

In the legalistic scenario, only those who have sinned “in the law” are judged by legalists as being judged and condemned where one can perish. You have to break the law in order to sin. There is no sin without the law and its transgression.

All this effectively counters and negates what all Jesus had to say on the matter of sin, where sin is tied to the condition of the heart, mind, and soul of a person, and not exclusively to the law.

Sin has its genesis in the heart, mind, and soul of a person. There is a proclivity to sin by those described in Scripture as having an evil heart, and where having an evil heart, such a person is incapable of doing anything that “hits the mark” when it comes to the glory of God.

(Matthew 12:35) A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.

Who is speaking here? Jesus the Christ; the One you are supposed to be listening to, to the exclusion of all others; the One who is greater than the Prophets and even Moses, to whom Jesus attributes the law.

(James 1:13-15) Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.

Sin lies at the core of mankind, cut off from God. They can do nothing to the glory of God. They stand in opposition to God, having what God describes as:

(Jeremiah 17:9) The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Jesus further elaborates:

(Matthew 7:17-19) Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

What is evil fruit? It is sin. It is the antithesis of good fruit. What is good fruit? Works done to the glory of God, which cannot be done by those producing evil fruit. Sins are NOT done to the glory of God. These evil fruits could be works done by those led by their evil hearts of stone and unbelief to their own glory, or their self-righteousness as we see done by the Pharisees and other religious elite of Israel; the same religious elite whom Jesus referred to as evil children of the devil, doing the will of their father.

Where did they derive their works; their fruits?

From the law; keeping the law, especially the works of the law.

Jesus uses the tithing law to show how their law-keeping was but an outward show.

(Matthew 23:23) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

The same could be said for their dedication to the Sabbath, circumcision, sacrifices, and many other commandments in the law regarding even clothing and grooming.

What then would you logically conclude if a “bad tree” happened to keep the Sabbath? Did such a person with their Sabbath-keeping refrain from sin? But if all the fruits of a bad tree are evil only, then how is keeping the Sabbath a "good fruit"?

Likewise, how would a person with an evil heart respond upon being told their Sabbath-keeping, which they believe is a good fruit, is in fact just another expression of evil coming from evil people?

They will do what evil people do, calling evil good, and good, evil.

(Isaiah 5:20) Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

But you see… that evil heart is “desperately” wicked, and will deceive the self into believing it is good, so much so, that such people who think themselves religious and righteous, will do anything to maintain the facade, even denying the undeniable.

(Luke 6:9) Then said Jesus unto them, I will ask you one thing; Is it lawful on the sabbath days to do good, or to do evil? to save life, or to destroy it?

Did Jesus here equate the destruction of life with doing good or doing evil?

The answer should be obvious.

What then of those legalists, specifically Adventists, whose hospitals have been performing elective abortions in their hospitals since the early 1970’s, where they have destroyed the most innocent of all human lives? The lives of humans, said to be created in the image of God, who have never sinned, and whose lives were destroyed without any due process provided in the law they claim to keep? Where and when was their hearing to appeal their death sentence, carried out by Adventism? Who stood as advocate for them? What happened to justice, mercy, and faith when it came to them?

It could hardly be said Adventism could be guilty of any greater sin in the eyes of God, but any Adventist reading this will still deny their duplicity; their complicity when it comes to this atrocity.

Many an Adventist, when confronted with this reality, claims they had no involvement in those decisions and actions performed by their church that claims to keep the commandments of God and keep the testimony of Christ where you just read the testimony of Christ regarding the destruction of life being evil.

************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************

Redefining Words, Terms, and Concepts

Many theological disagreements aren't caused by different Bible verses, they begin with different definitions. Sabbatarians purposefully shift definitions to make the debate possible.

---

Sabbatarians (primarily Adventists) hide behind a cloak of obfuscation. Words, terms, and concepts are thrown about without any fixed, concrete definition of what they mean. Should you attempt to debate them based on a particular definition, they simply shift the narrative by shifting the definitions. Should you attempt to pin them down on what they mean through the usage of a word, they will refuse, often by not even responding.

The Decalogue is defined by them as “moral” law, yet they never, ever define what constitutes a “moral” law. Nor do they ever provide any credible, biblical evidence that backs up the claim they are “moral” law any more than they do when it comes to “ceremonial” law, which is treated in like fashion.

Sin is “defined” by them as any transgression of the “moral” law, thereby further constructing a theology based on loosely defined concepts. Actual, solid, biblically-derived definitions are simply ignored as if they do not exist, and if cited by others, they are not acknowledges as relevant.

“Law” is not defined based on context. It is defined as needed to support the established theology and belief system. This same process is applied to other key words within Sabbatarianism such as 'commandment(s)', and 'Sabbath'.

This is not limited to biblical words, terms, and concepts. Take the term “Sunday keeper” often cited as a pejorative. “Sunday” normally is understood and defined to mean the first day of the week in the widely used Roman calendar. However, it takes on a completely different meaning within Sabbatarianism, where is it associated with sun worship on that day. So, a “Sunday keeper” is often defined as one who worships the sun on that day; not God, and definitely not the “Sun of Righteousness” referenced in Malachi.

(Malachi 4:2) But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.

This practice of the redefinition of words, terms, and concepts is a dynamic process, invoked when necessary to validate their belief system, or in order to disparage and condemn a belief system outside their own.

“Sabbath keeper” is defined as one who "keeps" the Sabbath; resting on that day, as well as worshiping God on that day in a corporate setting. The term is never defined in like fashion as how “Sunday keeper” is defined, where Sabbath is linked to Saturday, and then to the worship of Saturn. If church on SUNday means worshipping the sun, doesn't church on SATURday mean worshipping Saturn? No. The methodology employed only applies to Sunday and never Saturday (or any other week day) with this never ending hypocritical process.

The word "law" does not always refer to the old(er) covenant law, but that is the preferred ‘default’ definition, so that there is no “other” law. Laws they wish to keep are "God's laws", while laws they to be ignored are "Laws of Moses". Neither of which are clearly defined.

Likewise, the word “commandment” is similarly treated. Jesus gave commandments that Adventists insist are associated already with old covenant commandments. Point out the inconsistency of this position, and they simply conclude the inconsistency is with you; not them.

By controlling the language, any debate; any dialogue of disagreement is curtailed. Copernicus and Galileo ran afoul of the prevailing beliefs and religion of their time where the prevailing beliefs included a flat earth and the planets and sun revolving around the earth, with enough supporting “evidence” to convince just about anyone.

Welcome then to the Renaissance of the religious dark ages.

************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************

God Judges According to the Heart

God's method of judgment is a righteous method. Legalism uses a different method entirely. As with the Pharisees, the result looks good on the outside, but on the inside is self-righteousness.

---

God declared He judges according to the heart; righteous judgment.

Mankind judges according to appearance; unrighteous judgment.

There are implications in this that mankind, with the evil hearts of unbelief, the deceitful and desperately wicked hearts of stone, are unaware of.

Mankind creates God in their own image. Man-made gods are a reflection of the men who create them. Instead of men doing the bidding of God, their gods do the bidding of man.

God gave the Hebrews a blood covenant law knowing full well what they would do with it: they would use and abuse it in order to later judge and condemn the God who gave them that law; elevating it to the status of another god besides God. The law became their god, a god they controlled and used to their own advantage, all the while appealing to the law as the “law of God” where to disobey them and the law was to disobey God.

Jesus the Christ came in the flesh and did what God does - works commensurate with the Spirit. He did these works even on the Sabbath, that demanded no ‘man’ do ‘any’ work on the Sabbath.

Predictably, the men who administered controlled the law accused Him of sin against the law for having worked good works on the Sabbath, judging with unrighteous judgment according to the evil heart of men, according to appearance. This is the type of judgment that they imbued their false god of law with, where they equivocated that law with God and the operations of God, so they mistakenly perceived that God thought like they thought and believed as they believed.

(Isaiah 55:8) For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.

Jesus commanded the people to judge with righteous judgment and not according to appearance… two contrasting ways of judgment where judging according to appearance is contrasted with righteous judgment. This makes judging according to appearance an unrighteous judgment, practiced by those with evil hearts who, according to Christ Jesus, can only do or perform evil works… producing evil fruits.

Even when trying to keep the law, they did evil in the sight of God, and this is in keeping with what Jesus said and taught; that a “bad tree” can ONLY produce bad/evil fruits/works.

The abuse of law resulted in evil people with the deceitful heart being deceived by their own hearts into thinking they were good and acceptable to God due to being deceived into believing they actually kept the law. In this regard, Psalms 44 is quite revealing. They could not understand why they were being punished with those things God said would happen upon disobedience when they were thoroughly convinced they were in compliance with the law; the same law Paul wrote to be the ministration of condemnation and death, engraved in stone; the letter of the law that kills.

Their perspective, seen through eyes controlled by desperately wicked hearts, could only see the law in the letter, and judge the self accordingly, with unrighteous judgment, according to appearance. “We are keeping the law, so why are we being punished as though we are not?”

To embrace the old covenant law is the ‘natural’ thing for a carnal mind to do in order to judge the self and others according to unrighteous judgment (GAL. 6:12-13), for an evil minded person seeks to accomplish two things:

1) Give the appearance of righteousness; being ‘obedient’ to the law of God. And,

2) Have the means to sate the evil desire to condemn others who do not agree with them and follow after them.

For the evil hearted, the law is a “win-win”. Any and all Scripture are simply dismissed out of hand if they contradict what their “deceitful” and “desperately wicked" hearts desire to believe as true (and there are many scriptures which do contradict them).

Righteousness comes through faith, not the law. None of the things in the following list comes from the law:

Justification (GAL. 2: 16)

Righteousness (GAL. 2: 21)

The Spirit (GAL. 3: 2)

Perfection (GAL. 3: 3; HEB. 7: 19)

Miracles (GAL. 3: 5)

Inheritance (GAL. 3: 18)

Life (GAL. 3: 21)

Grace (GAL. 5: 4)

Faith (GAL. 3: 12)

And if righteousness does not come through law, something else does: unrighteousness. Self-righteousness which is odious and obnoxious to God.

The law that produces wrath - the law that kills - produces this function against those who choose the law. They want the law; they use the law, believing that, ultimately, it will produce good things for them and “righteous” judgment against others who disagree with them; that very law stands against them, condemning them for ‘flaunting’ the law; the same law Paul stated was made for the unrighteous and not the righteous; for righteousness is derived through faith; an attribute of the Spirit, associated with righteous judgment, looking to the heart and not appearance, built into the letter of the law.

************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************

What About the Gentiles? - Part I

Some say the Covenants and the Savior were for Israel only. This series explores one of the Bible's biggest themes: how God called Israel to reclaim all people through Jesus Christ. Along the way, we'll ask what that means for the Covenants, the law, the Gentiles, and Israel itself.

---

BIG ideas to discuss. Guessing this will have to be a two-parter. I wonder if I can even do this topic justice, and if not then why bother? But I think I have to at least try to write about this. I've touched on this topic in the past but never really went into any depth on it. Time to weigh in, it seems. I go where the Spirit leads. Now, on to the set up!

I've seen it thrown at Christians many times in the past, by a very small but vocal minority, that the Biblical covenants were made with Israel only. The conclusion we are supposed to reach form this is: therefore Gentiles are rejected unless they become Jews first in order to become Christians.
(Or, to be more precise, unless they become like the people who are making these kinds of accusations.) And so we end up hearing questions like, "Is Jesus the Messiah of the Gentiles?" and "Are the Gentiles even called?"

I strongly disagree with these people.
...mostly.

It should be obvious that this entire "Jesus isn't the Messiah of the Gentiles" line is patently ridiculous on its face from a reading of the Bible, or church history with its 2,000 years of miracles and faith. But apparently a person can believe anything if they want it badly enough.

Looks like our work is cut out for us. In this series, we go through the Bible.
Let's start where they get it right. The two great covenants were made with Israel. It's true!

PLURAL

Here are some fundamental verses which we cannot simply ignore. This calls for humility on the part of the Gentiles. Swallow your pride with me, and read on.

(JER. 31: 31) Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah...

Notice with whom God intended to make the Covenant. The author of Hebrews does not modify it.

(HEB. 8: 7-8) 7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second. 8 Because finding fault with them, He says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah...

Paul confirms the covenants were made with Israel. Gentiles aren't mentioned.

(ROM. 9: 3-5) For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my countrymen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom pertain the adoption, the glory, the covenants [plural], the giving of the law, the service of God, and the promises; 5 of whom are the fathers and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, the eternally blessed God. Amen.

Notice, "the covenants" is plural. The covenants are Israel's. Contrast that with the Gentiles.

(EPH. 2: 11-12) 11 Therefore remember that you, once Gentiles in the flesh—who are called Uncircumcision by what is called the Circumcision made in the flesh by hands— 12 that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants [plural] of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.

Again, covenants is plural. Strangers to the covenants.

Now, of course the New Covenant was going to be made with Israel because it replaces the Old Covenant. But there's more.

JESUS' MISSION

Let us not overlook what Jesus said about His own mission:

(MAT. 15:14) But He answered and said, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

That whole interaction there is quite telling. Easy to misunderstand, but telling.
The same thing happens when Jesus sent out the twelve on their first missionary journey:

(MAT. 10:5-6) 5 These twelve Jesus sent out and commanded them, saying: “Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

Not sent to Gentiles. Ouch.

By now I bet you're wondering what are the implications for the Gentiles? The verses above build a terrible case for us Gentiles. Let's not fool ourselves.

CONVENIENCE

Do we Gentiles have no place in the New Covenant? Are we without a Savior? Are we hopelessly and eternally lost?

No!

We are included. We are saved. We are reclaimed.

Didn't I just built up a case that the Gentiles are not included? Yes. But those verses are not the whole Bible. All I've given you so far are one-sided proof-texts. In the Protestant Bible, which is smaller than others, there are 66 books by 40 authors. I bet we can find more on this subject if we actually look.

I bet there are some who are already guessing I am about to rely entirely on Paul. There are some who reject Paul and call him a false Apostle because he says things they don't like ...until he starts saying things they do like. No, I am not at all basing this only on Paul. Not even close. And this very thing, dear reader, is what this post is really about:

Gentiles are reclaimed and we don't need Paul to demonstrate it.

That doesn't mean I will avoid citing Paul, though. I am not ashamed of Paul at all. I accept Paul. The other Apostles accepted Paul. The early church accepted Paul. I see no reason at all to avoid Paul. I think calling Paul a false Apostle is merely an act of convenience rather than a solid position. It's an attempt to eliminate the biggest rival. I won't go along with it.
That said, I am not going to rely on Paul in this post.

Even worse are the "Red Letter Christians"; the ones who only accept the parts of the New Testament that are direct quotes of Jesus (except for the Sheet Vision, the calling of Saul, quotes in Revelation, etc etc). So, we can agree enough with the Apostles to believe they followed and accurately quoted Jesus, but we think they are unreliable about everything else? <sarcasm>Makes perfect sense.</sarcasm>

I couldn't disagree more with a theology that rests on 'if I can't get my way, then I will rip content from the New Testament until it no longer says what I don't like.'

To start building a case, I think we must see how the Gentiles got into this mess in the first place. Understanding the start of the story is necessary if you want to understand the finish.

THREE STRIKES

How did the Gentiles come to this low state to begin with? Cut off from the Living God. Disinherited. Hopeless. Cursed.

I went over this already in "Once and Future King - Part I" and "Once and Future King - Part II". So, I will summarize. This is critical to the whole idea. Please, don't take this lightly.

All mankind rejected God three times: 1) the Garden of Eden, 2) the Great Flood, and 3) the Tower of Babel. Bear in mind there were no "Jews" or "Gentiles" yet. All peoples bear some responsibility for what happened then. At that point, God let us have it our way. We did not want God as our God? So be it. We can have our lesser spirit beings and our wood and stone idols, and our knowledge of good and evil, and everything that comes with it, including disinheritance from God. So, God chose to do what He did several times in the Old Testament: He started again through one person. Immediately after Babel begins the story of Abraham.

Abraham was called for several reasons: 1) to be the progenitor of God's chosen people, Israel, 2) to provide a way for the coming of the Messiah, 3) to initiate the eventual reclamation of the nations, and 4) because of 1-3, to bring blessings to all people.
Yes, reclamation and blessing. Read the commission God gave to Abram:

(GEN. 12:3) I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse him who curses you; and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.

All the families. In order for all families to be blessed, all families have to participate. That means the nations would be reclaimed. That means Gentiles.

Think about that. So here God is, separating Abraham so He can create Israel as His called and chosen inheritance in the whole world, because the world rejected Him, but before He even gets through the initial conversation, He is talking about the reclamation of the nations. Undoing that rejection was part of the rejection.
I mean, seriously ... that's amazing!

The Old Covenant had certain terms (laws) that were intended to keep Israel distinct from the Gentiles, and to keep Israel from following the Gentiles down the path toward idolatry and disinheritance. It's not that Gentiles weren't allowed near Israel, but the repeated warning was about the Gentiles' idolatry. Don't do what the Gentiles do and you won't get what the Gentiles got.
...but they did.

Once Messiah comes - more specifically, once Messiah dies - the goal is reached, the reason for Abraham being called out and Israel separated is fulfilled, the wound that happened at Babel is healed, the rejection is undone, and the distinctions made within the law between Israel and Gentile are no longer necessary (GAL. 3:19-24).

Remember those verses above where Jesus' mission was to Israel only? Well, yeah. None of those goals were reached yet. What time was it? The Old Covenant didn't end when He was born, it ended when He died. Of course His ministry before He died was to Israel only. It was the Old Covenant period!
A large part of what He came to do was to personally represent all Israel, as the True Israel, and fulfill Israel's end of the covenant because the Israelites wouldn't do it on their own. They wouldn't keep their end of the bargain, so God kept it for them. He is the law-keeper. He is the Covenant-keeper. Once it was fulfilled, then the Old Covenant could end. Was He supposed to confirm a New Covenant that wasn't even inaugurated yet?

He fulfilled it all. He died. The Old Covenant dissolved. In comes the New Covenant.

...but it wasn't revealed that the Gentiles were part of the plan for several more years. That means the New Covenant was ratified with Israel, precisely as scripture says. And that means Israel continues to have a special place in the New Covenant. The question becomes ... what do you mean by "Israel"? 

ABRAHAM AND ISAAC

Before we finish off, consider the puzzle that is Abraham.

Abraham was not an Israelite. Israel was Abraham's grandson. How can Abraham be a descendant of his own grandson? Yet he was not exactly a Gentile, either. Abraham was a special case. Called out of the nations, but never called a Gentile. He is a special hybrid. Like Noah, Abraham had one foot on either side. No other person can quite be said to have these qualities, not even Isaac.
Have you ever wondered why it is Abraham and then Isaac and then Israel? Why is Isaac in the middle like that?
Isaac has the very special role to play in that he mirrors where the Messiah comes in. He was the beloved son, the son of promise, born miraculously, symbolically sacrificed, through whom the promises and inheritance flowed.   Abraham → Isaac.     Abraham → Messiah.

To put that another way: All mankind → Abraham → Isaac.     Abraham → Messiah → All mankind.

It all fits together. It's all a circle. The end is pictured in the beginning.

Do you see how this is all a loop? The rejection at Babel and the healing at Calvary are connected. All people had a hand in rejecting God at the start, and all people had a hand in rejecting the Messiah at the finish. The finish loses context without the beginning. The finish corrects and heals the beginning. And now you understand why the Messiah is not for Israel only. The healing was not all about Israel alone. All peoples had a hand in causing the problem in the first place, so the solution is also about all peoples.

CONCLUSION

To recap -
It wasn't just the Gentiles who rejected God, it was all peoples. As a result, God called out one man, Abraham, in order to build Israel, His special covenant people. Israel was built specifically in order to bring about the Messiah. The Messiah is the means to heal the rejection that led to the calling of Abraham. It all comes around. If you know the overarching story in the Bible, then you know the Gentiles are going to be reclaimed.

(JON. 12:32) And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself.

To think the Messiah came for Israel alone is to completely misunderstand the entire Bible.

People tend to think Jesus Christ came to save them from their personal sins. Sure. He did. But there's a whole lot more to it than just that. He came to save you from a much larger issue. Great and awesome is our God!

All of that was buildup, backstory if you will, a setting of the stage to what I really wanted to get into. In the next post, we are going to see how the reclamation of the Gentiles was predicted in multiple verses throughout the Old Testament and the New. No Paul necessary.

************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************

Jesus Came To Reveal Spiritual Things

The ministry of Jesus shifted the focus from external rule-keeping to the spiritual realities those rules could never produce. This article examines what that means for the Sabbath.

---

Examine the Beatitudes. They are all about having a converted mindset in relation to the things being discussed by Him. He concludes this part of his preaching with this:

(Matthew 5:16) Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

The attributes mentioned are those of a converted person; not the attributes of those of evil people whom God described through Jeremiah as having deceitful and desperately wicked hearts.

As for those being referred to in the opening remarks of Matthew chapter 5, Jesus states that their works are good works, where men who witness them glorify their Father in Heaven.

What happens if these people, followers of Christ Jesus, were to carry out good works on the Sabbath?

Those with the deceitful and desperately wicked hearts, who are deceived by their own hearts who think themselves religious, would do to them what they did to Jesus: declare His works - His GOOD works - to be evil and sin on the Sabbath; opting for the law that commanded no one do “any” work on the Sabbath, not even so much as preparing a meal.

Verse 16 is being overlooked by the “religious” of today; obscured and overshadowed by those who constantly refer to verse 17, claiming the law remains inviolate down to jots and tittles.

An average man on the street, not so ‘obsessive’ over the law as were the Pharisees, might well have witnessed Jesus perform a miracle of healing - the alleviation of afflictions by Jesus on the Sabbath - resulting in that person glorifying the Father in Heaven, from awe and wonder of having witnessed events never seen by any of them or their forefathers, such as a man born blind made to see, and the resurrection of the dead back to life.

Not so with the Pharisees and others of like ‘mind’, who attributed Christ’s miracles to the ‘glory’ of the devil simply because such a wonderous miracle was done on the Sabbath day.

Paul wrote the law is not of faith. He also wrote that there exists now a law of faith; a law of the Spirit. Those under the old(er) blood covenant law were dealt with almost exclusively with laws, rites and rituals that were physical in nature; physically oriented for a physically, carnally-minded people. Now, with Christ, a spiritual aspect is revealed, non-corporeal, dealing entirely with the heart, mind, and soul of people (the inward man), in a condition foreign to the things the blood covenant law dealt with. The blood covenant law dealt with those possessed of a deceitful and desperately wicked heart; commanding them, for the most part, to refrain from doing evils through force of will in obedience to regulations. Don’t commit adultery. Don’t commit murder. Don’t bear false witness. Don’t steal. Don’t have other gods. Don’t even desire or lust after that which belongs to another.

What is fascinating is how easily a deceptive and desperately wicked heart will rationalize and circumvent these commandments, and more, from either direction.

An otherwise good work is condemned by them if performed on their Sabbath. After all, they rationalize, “any” work is forbidden.

Then it all flips with other laws, such as not to commit murder. First, let’s define murder. It is the unlawful taking of another’s life without due process of the law in order to determine if a killing was justified or not. Capital punishment is prescribed by the law and carried out by those duly charged with doing so. Some killings were and are justified due to defense of one’s self or family, or even a third party. Same as in conditions of war. However, it is all flipped over when it comes to the destruction of the most innocent of lives; something Jesus specifically related was evil, that has been happening in Adventist hospitals since the early 1970’s, beginning with the Adventist Hospital located in Kailua, Hawaii -- Castle Hospital.

The same Adventists who will turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to the destruction of innocent life, an act which God calls evil, will revile you and charge you with sin for doing a good work, influenced by the Holy Spirit in you, if done on their Sabbath.

Can it get any more perverse than that?

But here’s the issue. They are mindful of the physical things at the expense of the spiritual.
They judge all based on the physical, grounded in being observational. They do not ‘see’ the Spirit or actions motivated by the Spirit. The motivation for all is the carnally-oriented law; not the law of the Spirit. They are blind to the Spirit and law of the Spirit, especially when it comes to the Sabbath commandment, which they embrace as the one thing they can rely on to keep up the outward appearance of obedience to the law, while behind closed doors the destruction of life takes place.

They should all be ashamed ...but they are not.
They fall back on the Sabbath and their ‘dedication’ to it. Notice then the parallel with this passage, attributed to God speaking:

(Amos 8:4-7) Hear this, O ye that swallow up the needy, even to make the poor of the land to fail, Saying, When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and the sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit? That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes; yea, and sell the refuse of the wheat? The LORD hath sworn by the excellency of Jacob, Surely I will never forget any of their works.

The solution of those ancient people was to persecute and kill the prophets who exposed their hypocrisies. Note well their dedication to the Sabbath, suspending their evil works on that day. These are the same kind of people who later condemned Jesus for working on the Sabbath; doing good works He declared lawful.

They needed the Sabbath. It was the cloak for their deceitful and desperately wicked hearts, where all was judged by the letter of the law and the appearance that afforded them.

Tell an Adventist today that good works are lawful on their fake sabbath day, tell them that even Jesus worked on the Sabbath, and some will respond with an accusation against you for you claiming Jesus sinned! It is that perverse heart trying to desperately maintain its cover through an attempt at accusing you; bearing false witness against you, where in their own minds they believe themselves compliant; ‘obedient’ to that law that is not of faith.

The New Covenant in Christ is not like the Old. It is entirely different, designed for different people. The old(er) blood covenant dealt with evil-hearted people, sinful by nature, tripping them up in their own deceit and deceptions. The new is a law of life for those with the new spiritual heart provided to them by God; His Holy Spirit dwelling IN the believer, guiding and leading him or her, and not a law designed to condemn the guilty; the evil ones with the evil hearts of unbelief; the deceitful and desperately wicked hearts of stone, who were aptly given a law engraved in stone; the same law set elevated by Adventists, given the attributes of God, making it another god besides God.

************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************

Another Perspective on the Sabbath

The conflict between Jesus and the religious leaders was never just about the Sabbath. It was about whether God's people would live by faith or remain under the condemnation of the law.

---

(Matthew 5:10-12) Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. °Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. °Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.

The perpetrators of this persecution are those Jesus identifies as those who also persecuted the prophets.

(Acts 7:52) Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers:

Saul, later known as Paul, persecuted the early church at the behest of the Sanhedrin. It was the Administrators of the law that led and directed the persecutions against the church.

After Paul’s conversion, he too experienced the very persecution he leveled upon the church by those same men, and often upon his travels, going to synagogues in order to preach to his kinsmen first wherever he went, even being stoned on occasion.

The perpetrators of persecution felt justified in doing so through the law. Christianity was not just another subset of Judaism; it was a radical departure, going way beyond even what the Helenized Jews were doing, having abandoned much of the law themselves.

Now, the narrative has flipped.

There are those who claim to be Christians, who have embraced the law, and now claim it is those who have abandoned the law that are not Christians. It is no longer the administrators of Judaism versus Christianity, it is a Judaistic Christianity versus a Christianity labeled “antinomian” by them as though the law of faith, the law of the Spirit in Christ Jesus, is no law at all.

One commonality among deceptive people is their use of accusations of sin and the consequences of sin, despite Jesus’ sacrifice.

Today, Sabbatarian groups such as Adventism emphasize the sin of daring to worship God on a “Sunday” without any scriptural authority from God. This distraction is designed to take your attention off of an important fact. The Jewish religious elite; Pharisees, scribes, Sadducees and the Sanhedrin, were all collectively referred to by Jesus as children of the devil, doing the will of their father the devil. What day did they keep? What day did they worship on? And if their father was the devil, who did they really worship?

Recall that the devil dragged down with him a third of the angelic host; angels who had a first hand knowledge of God.

Sabbatarians are quick to claim the devil stole Sundays; the first day of the week in the Roman calendar, from God, right out from under His nose. But stop and consider… one of the basic doctrines of warfare is to know your enemy. The devil would steal Sundays in the Roman calendar, but make no attempt to commandeer the Sabbath?

Let’s take a good, hard look at the situation extant when Jesus walked the earth in the flesh. The religious elite administered the law. They literally controlled life and death over the man in the street, and the people feared them; feared what they could do to them. If you ran afoul of the Sabbath law they administered, you ran afoul of them. It was one of the weapons in their arsenal of control and intimidation, and here was this itinerant, self-appointed Rabbi flaunting the Sabbath openly, in deviance to their positions in the administration of the religion.

I remind the reader that Jesus referred to them as thieves and robbers who preceded Him. They occupied a God-ordained position of administering the law with justice, mercy, and faith, and failed in their God-given duties, despite their condition of authority – and corrupt, evil people, once in positions of power, are difficult to oust, for their society was made up of a people God described as having deceitful and desperately wicked hearts; hearts of stone and as the author of Hebrews declared; evil hearts of unbelief. Ridding yourself of one only lets another like-minded and hearted move up that ladder of power and control.

The Sabbath was but to them a means of control over the masses. Today, Sabbatarian churches aggressively proselytize through accusations of sin and resultant condemnation for those who openly are disobedient to the “law of God” they overlook being a covenant law that had legal parties to it, and ended, legally and prophetically, replaced with a new and better covenant of life.

The children of the devil do not want to see people embrace faith and life. Their desire is to see you join them in their dissimulation, embracing the law of sin and death, where now, to embrace the old, is to also reject Christ’s sacrifice that terminated that covenant law, even as a marriage covenant terminates upon the death of either party, as explained by Paul in Romans 7.

What do you think baptism of water signified to those who were under the law? It was a symbolic death and resurrection for them. They died to the old covenant law so as to be legally acceptable to enter into the new with Christ, where both the old covenant and the new are likened to marriage covenants, where God years earlier divorced Israel, and His death on the cross completing the dissolution of that covenant.

The law is not of faith. You have read this. And whatever is not of faith is sin now, for those living and waling IN faith; that narrow path of life; that law of faith. Turning back to the law is to turn your back on Christ and what His death accomplished on your behalf.

Paul warned his readers of doing this very thing in Galatians 5:1.

(Galatians 5:1) Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

Read the narrative leading up to this. It tells you what this yoke of bondage is, and who all it is that persecutes those who God has freed from sin and the condemnation of the law.

Doing so; effectively negating the sacrifice of Christ due to unbelief, has severe consequences, brought out in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-12. The followers of Christ have a love of truth, and Christ Jesus is / was Truth Incarnate.

He broke the Sabbath commandment; trampling all over it in defiance of those religious elite who administered the law for their own selfish motives. One greater than the law stood before them, doing miracles that could only be attributed to God, and they denied Him; hated Him and were going to do whatever it took to subdue Him and those who followed Him, now led by the Holy Spirit.

(Acts 7:52) Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers:

Those led by the law are not led by the Holy Spirit. God is a “jealous” God. He will not permit you to serve two masters; Him and the law He placed the faithless Hebrews under; a law of sin and death they justly deserved… the ‘ministration of condemnation and death, engraved in stones’ as Paul points out in 2 Corinthians chapter 3.

The law does not save. The law condemns. The law produces wrath and makes all guilty before God.

Christ saves, through obedience to the faith. This through the inner working of the Holy Spirit, given to those who believe Him and IN Him, only, solely, and not faith in Him in partnership or association with the law that condemns, or in partnership with you in relation to anything you do outside of strictly faith and trust in Him, all to the glory of God.

************

It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom. ; )

Acts 17:11

************