Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Thankful for Grace

Now that I'm done with the Easter study, I seem to be meditating quite a bit on my time in bondage to Herbert Armstrong's error.

In my time confined in Armstrongism, I spoke out boldly against Easter and those who observe it. I concentrated on the name, putting forward grossly inappropriate and highly questionable statements as fact - for instance that "Easter comes from the pagan goddess Eostre, who is Ishtar, and the Bible says God hates Ishtar." I fashioned verbal weapons regarding the pagan origins of eggs and bunnies and lilies, and I beat my fellow Christian with those weapons.
I claimed a billion+ men, women, and children, who call on the name of Jesus Christ and trust in Him for their hope and salvation, were no Christians at all but merely pagans fooling themselves straight into God's wrath.
I threw the term "heretics" at historical figures like Anicetus and Justin and Bede and many others. I was ignorant towards what these people wrote because they were heretics after all and why would I read the lies of heretics?
Rather, I poured over the material of Herbert W Armstrong to devour his facts and figures and private interpretations regarding these things as if those writings were the Gospel itself. I treated them as infallible. I searched for other information that agreed with me on these things. All else had to be lies!
I made excuse after distorted excuse for why the Bible, especially Galatians and Romans, weren't saying what they most certainly were saying, or why the timing of events and days wasn't what it most certainly was, or why this or that thing was a pagan, idolatrous sin when that was in reality not the case.
I disregarded the grace of Christ and treated the law as if the weekly Sabbath were nailed to the cross and died for my sins.
Until I stopped being afraid.

I had no idea that my motivation was twofold: fear and pride.

Fear. I was so untrusting of Jesus Christ to handle my salvation that I went on, day after uncertain day, wondering if I would wake up in God's presence to be glorified forever or eternally condemned to death. I had no confidence, no trust... no faith! Because my heart was on my own efforts, and I could not escape the poor quality of my own works. While I feared about trusting myself, I was also afraid to death at the idea of trusting Christ. The thought of putting everything in Christ's hands terrified me; I couldn't do it. 
I was battling against grace, while believing I was battling towards it.

(I JON. 4: 17-19) 17 Love has been perfected among us in this: that we may have boldness in the day of judgment; because as He is, so are we in this world. 18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment. But he who fears has not been made perfect in love. 19 We love Him because He first loved us.

Pride. I was in God's true Church! We had the truth! In Armstrongism, we believe it to be axiomatic that 99.9% of all who lived had no understanding of the things we knew, and that our "truth" came only from God's Spirit. It wasn't that we believed lies and the obvious distortions of fact and faith drove others away, certainly not! It was Providence guiding us. Others were just blind, pathetic fools to be pitied. They would be resurrected to shame. The wonders stored up for me, on the other hand, were beyond description. Comparing man to man made all that fear I had previously described go calmly away for a short time. At least I wasn't a pagan! I was tormented in my deepest heart, so the salve was to point out the flaws in others. My pride had shut my eyes and my ears to anything but the teachings of the founder, Pastor General, and spiritual and temporal leader of the Church since its inception, Herbert W Armstrong.
But we were all of us deceived.

(I TIM. 6: 3-5) 3 If anyone teaches otherwise and does not consent to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which accords with godliness, 4 he is proud, knowing nothing, but is obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, 5 useless wranglings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain [not just gaining money, but gaining salvation]. From such withdraw yourself.

When my eyes opened and I saw the love of Jesus Christ, and I knew for the first time the limitless expanse of His selfless love and grace, the shackles fell off, and the prison doors opened wide. The light shone into my heart and I could see what a fool I was!
In reality, the shackles had fallen off and the gate had opened wide now these one thousand nine hundred and eighty (give or take) years ago. I needed merely to walk out of the prison. What was I waiting for? It was as if the door had rusted solid and had fallen off. The shackles turn to dust at the slightest touch and float away in the sweet breeze. The prison walls had crumbled long ago and flowers had grown up over them. All that was ugly and fearful and the long shadows that gnashed at me... were all in my mind. All long gone in the comforting light of the Son, and the new day in Him.
What on earth was I waiting for?!

Now, Herbert Armstrong has no more power over me. I am not afraid any more! Now I can know the truth, and the truth has set me free (JON. 8: 32).

(II COR. 5: 21) For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

Thank God for His wonderful gift of grace!

************ It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom.
Acts 17:11

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Easter History - part II

In part I of this series, we investigated Passover and how that ties in with the Lord’s Supper. We saw how Jesus changed the Passover and we saw it is not the Passover of the Old Covenant. Jesus made all things new (II COR. 5: 17).
In this installment, we will investigate how the Lord’s Supper ties in with Easter, and we will answer not a few questions that I hope clear things up about Easter and its supposedly pagan origins.


When Jesus and the Apostles ate the Last Supper early on the 14th, they used all new symbols that were a remembrance of Him. This broke the remembrance away from the Passover Seder which is held early on the 15th with old symbols that were a remembrance of the Exodus. The name Passover remained.

Easter is an English word; and not by any means the original name of the feast. Passover is an English word too. Anyone who wants to make a huge deal about calling something by a different name should remember that the name of the celebration isn’t Passover. In Hebrew and Aramaic the name is Pesach. In Greek and Latin the name is Pascha. "Nisan", as in the month of Nisan, is also a pagan name. It's Babylonian. The Hebrews adopted it during the Exile. If names is your sticking point, then definitely you should avoid celebrating Passover on the 14th of Nissan.
BTW.. switch to "Abib" all you like; that's a Canaanite name. (Pagan!)

When the New Testament was being formed, the name of the Last Supper was “Pascha.” Pascha is used 29 times in the New Testament. When the KJV translates Acts 12: 4 into Easter, the original word is Pascha. When the Quartodecimans and the church in the West argued over timing, they argued over one and the same feast, which was Pascha. When we read the ancient histories, particularly by Eusebius who wrote about the infamous Council of Nicea, the word he used was Pascha. This is the name that was used for hundreds of years before English even became a language or the word Easter was ever uttered. To this very day the name of the Easter celebration throughout most of Christendom is Pascha (or some very similar derivitive), as it always had been.
The Catholic Encyclopedia lists a great number of the Paschal names:
"The Greek term for Easter, pascha, has nothing in common with the verb paschein, "to suffer," although by the later symbolic writers it was connected with it; it is the Aramaic form of the Hebrew pesach (transitus, passover). The Greeks called Easter the pascha anastasimon; Good Friday the pascha staurosimon. The respective terms used by the Latins are Pascha resurrectionis and Pascha crucifixionis. In the Roman and Monastic Breviaries the feast bears the title Dominica Resurrectionis; in the Mozarabic Breviary, In Lætatione Diei Pasch Resurrectionis; in the Ambrosian Breviary, In Die Sancto Paschæ. The Romance languages have adopted the Hebrew-Greek term: Latin, Pascha; Italian, Pasqua; Spanish, Pascua; French, Pâques. Also some Celtic and Teutonic nations use it: Scottish, Pask; Dutch, Paschen; The correct word in Dutch is actually Pasen; Danish, Paaske; Swedish, Pask; even in the German provinces of the Lower Rhine the people call the feast Paisken not Ostern. The word is, principally in Spain and Italy, identified with the word "solemnity" and extended to other feasts, e.g. Sp., Pascua florida, Palm Sunday; Pascua de Pentecostes, Pentecost; Pascua de la Natividad, Christmas; Pascua de Epifania, Epiphany. In some parts of France also First Communion is called Pâques, whatever time of the year administered." 
-Holweck, Frederick. "Easter." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1909. 19 Apr. 2010.
So, the origin of the Easter celebration is indeed the Jewish Passover; particularly the Last Supper which Jesus ate with His Apostles. As the article demonstrates, the celebration is still called Passover in all non-Germanic languages throughout Europe and west Asia. We can definitively conclude that the origin of Easter is not pagan, as some claim. Regardless of what it's called.


I would like to divert briefly into the origins of Lent, because this has so much to do with the timing of Easter as we see it today.

It was traditional even in the Apostle’s day to fast before Passover. (Technically, this is a holdover from an ancient Hebrew tradition where the first-born male would fast before Passover.) So Lent, regardless of tales told on the Internet and in Adventist circles, is not of pagan origin either. It was adopted from the Jews.

Practices regarding the Lenten fast varied from region to region and town to town. Some people fasted only from certain kinds of food, some from all food, some from food and water; some for one day, some for a week, and some for 40 days. Fasts were fairly common in those days. Many cities fasted every Saturday. The Catholic and Orthodox churches still have traditions regarding fasting Sunday mornings until one receives Communion (Eg. see Catachism Part II, Section II, Chapter I, Article 3, VI, 1387).
In those early years, there was no set rule regarding observance of Lent. But they all, more or less, seemed to agree on ending the fast at the 14th of Nissan.

Now, you should know that the Hebrew calendar was a complex piece of work to begin with, incorporating many postponements, observations, and cycles. To complicate matters further, many people, like Colin Humphreys in his book "The Mystery of the Last Supper", claim there were at least two different "Hebrew" calendars (Eg. See "Qumran Calendar").
After the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, and when the Jews were banished from Jerusalem because of the Bar Kochba revolt in 136 AD, calculating the timing of seasons, months, and days became even more difficult for the Jews. The Sanhedrin began closely guarding the means to calculate the calendar. In 359 AD, Rabbi Hilel II revamped the calculation of the calendar and included much more accurate calculation methods.
But by that time, however, the Latin Christians had already had enough.

Up until the 300's, the eastern Greek Christians followed the example of a Paschal fast ending on the 14th of the Hebrew month of Nisan, while the western Latin Christians followed the example of a Paschal fast ending on the Lord’s Day after the 14th. Now, it wasn't exactly an East/West split, but to draw you a map would be impossible, so let's just call it East/West here for the sake of simplicity.
The Europeans eventually found tracking the 14th of Nissan to be prohibitively disruptive, and didn’t fancy binding the celebration of Jesus’ death and resurrection to the calendar and calculations of the Jews who rejected Christ [this was the attitude of some of them as recorded by Eusebius]. All they wanted was a static date for Pascha and an answer on when to end the Paschal fast.

The debate between east and west regarding the timing of the end of the fast is now called the  "Quartodecimen Controversy." The people who insisted on the importance of the 14th of Nisan were called Quartodecimens (from the Latin word for 14).
No one at that time ever doubted when Jesus ate the Last Supper and was crucified, nor did anyone ever doubt the time of His resurrection. From late in the first century, after the destruction of the temple, the western churches observed the Last Supper on the Sunday after the 14th of Nisan; the eastern churches on the 14th itself. But the disagreement was never over paganism in any way, shape, or form.
Eusebius (who was there), clearly and without equivocation, shows us that the celebration people argued over is none other than the Last Supper, which is Passover. Eusebius says there was a:
“diversity of judgment in regard to the time for celebrating one and the same feast”.
-Eusebius, Life of Constantine, book III, chapter V, in section “Of the Disagreement Respecting the Celebration of Easter”.
So, it was one and the same Feast! While Herbert Armstrong would invent an argument over paganism, Eusebius, who was there, says no such thing. The arguing was not over any pagan roots of Easter. I find it odd that the Armstrongists refuse to observe Lent, calling it pagan and inventing inaccurate histories regarding it, when all of Christendom observed it and the Quartodecimen Controversy was mainly regarding it.

So, Easter is Pascha. Pascha is Easter. And Lent is not pagan.


It is unfortunate that certain Germanic languages and English have changed the name of the festival, and certain people have latched onto that name in order to build a false case against it.
Easter is a modern English word. It is most likely taken from the Old English word “Eastre.” All scholars are not agreed about the etymology (when are all scholars ever in agreement) but this seems very plausible. English is a Germanic language, after all. The Germans call it "Ostern". Both the Old English Eastre and the German Ostern seem to come from the German word “Ostarmonath".
So, what is that?

Armstrongists and Wiccans would make a great deal over the idea that “Eostre” is the name of a pagan goddess. But you should know something about that. The only source we have for the “Eostre was a pagan goddess” theory are the writings of a Catholic Benedictine monk named Bede (also called “the Venerable Bede”) in his work “De Temporum Ratione” (“The Reckoning of Time”) which he wrote in the early 700’s AD.
So, for all people who think Catholics are unreliable liars, your condemnation rests on Catholic writings. Keep that in mind.

Bede was a historian and was attempting to determine the history of the English and Germanic peoples. Here is exactly what he wrote, translated into English of course:
"Eosturmonath has a name which is now translated 'Paschal month', and which was once called after a goddess of theirs named Eostre, in whose honour feasts were celebrated in that month. Now they designate that Paschal season by her name, calling the joys of the new rite by the time-honoured name of the old observance."
When we actually read Bede’s own writings as opposed to taking pseudo-historical Internet gossip on blind faith, we learn that Eostremonath is the old High German name for the month of April. Bede goes on to say that by his day any customs relating to Eostre had died out and the Paschal Month alone was celebrated. And that’s really all he says about it.

Keep clearly in mind that Bede is clear that all customs relating to Eostre had died out by his time. Anyone who tries to tie eggs or bunnies to this Germanic tradition has to contradict Bede who tells us all traditions had died out and were replaced by Paschal traditions. To rely on Bede to make a claim in the first place, then completely ignore what Bede actually says, to me, is not proper.

I must make it abundantly clear that this particular spelling of Eostre is Bede’s alone, as there was no official spelling. And the word is Germanic but Bede wrote in Latin, complicating the matter somewhat. To be completely accurate, there was no official spelling of the English, either, since the first English dictionary wasn’t written until 1604.
Why mention this? Two reasons.
First, to explain that Eostre and Ostara, while spelled differently, are really the same thing. And Eostremonath and Ostarmonath are also the exact same thing.
Second, to hopefully prevent people from thinking that perhaps Bede got this idea of a goddess from somewhere else, perhaps even someplace official. Well, there was no somewhere else, and there was no someplace official. Bede is the origin of the goddess claim.

Do we have any other information about Ostarmonath? Yes.

We know that Charlemagne, scourge of the German pagans, officially named the month of April “Ostarmanoth” around the year 800. (Any Encyclopedia or a thousand other sources will have info on this. See the WikiPedia article on the Julian Calendar under the section “Month names” for example.) That name remained until the 15th century, while unofficially the name was used even until the 20th century, and might even still be used to this day by some people.
So Bede, spelling aside, is completely accurate on the name of the month. It’s the name of the goddess that we doubt here.

There is yet another important detail you should be aware of.
The Germanic week days were named after gods and goddesses. This is completely undeniable, and we know of the gods that the days were named after. The months, on the other hand, were not named after gods and goddesses. They were named after meteorological or environmental events. In fact, when we look in the old German, we find no certain parallel for any goddess named Eostre. Bede apparently made it up, out of an innocent best-effort to explain the etymology of Ostarmonath.

The name of the month comes from the name of the goddess, according to Bede, who has no corroborating proof. So it’s the month that was named after the goddess, not the Paschal feast. The Paschal feast is renamed after the month, not the goddess. So, even if Bede were right, the goddess still bears no direct influence on Easter. The alleged goddess bears influence on the name of the month, and the name of the month bears influence on the word Easter.
Thus, to the detriment of all who love to condemn a billion+ Christians, the timing bears far more on the name than any goddess does.


Some people argue that Eostre is another name for a Germanic fertility goddess called Ostara (among other names). However, there is a great deal of speculation involved here.

A little known truth is that this “Eostre = Ostara” claim actually originates with Jakob Grimm, of the Grimm Brothers Fairy Tales. Don’t let the fairy tale connection sour you; the Grimm brothers were highly intelligent, well read, and thoroughly credentialed scholars!

Jakob Grimm wrote a book on German mythology which was first published in 1835 under the title “Deutsche Mythologie” (“Teutonic Mythology”) in which he investigated the origins of Eostre. The section on Ostara appears in Volume I, in chapter XIII section 7 which is titled “Hruoda (Hrede). Ostara (Eastre)”. Most of the information about Ostara comes in two paragraphs.
That's it. Two paragraphs.

Though I fear it will needlessly lengthen this study, I will print every word that Jacob Grimm has written here for you to read in order that you may see how speculative it is for yourself:

"On the other hand, the Anglo-Saxon historian [Bede] tells us the names of two beings, whom he expressly calls ancient goddesses of his people, but of whose existence not a trace is left among other Germans. ... The two goddesses, whom Beda [Bede] (de temporum ratione cap. 13) cites very briefly, without any description, merely to explain the months named after them, are Hrede and Eastre, March taking its Saxon name from the first, and April from the second... It would be uncritical to saddle this father of the church, who everywhere keeps heathenism at a distance, and tells us less of it than he knows, with the invention of these goddesses."
-Grimm.[emphasis mine]  
Alternate link: http://www.northvegr.org/lore/grimmst/013_10.php
"We Germans to this day call April ostermonat, and Ostarmanoth is found as early as Eginhart [an abbot who worked as a Secretary for Charlemagne]. The great christian festival, which usually falls in April or the end of March, bears in the oldest of [Old High German] remains the name ostara; it is found mostly in the plural, because two days were kept at Easter. This Ostara, like the [Anglo Saxon] Eastre, must in the heathen religion have denoted a higher being, whose worship was so firmly rooted, that the christian teachers tolerated the name, and applied it to one of their own grandest anniversaries. All the nations bordering on us have retained the Biblical 'pascha'; even Uliphilas writes paska, not austro, though he must have known the word; the Norse tongue also has imported its paskir, Swedish pask, Danish paaske. The [Old High German] adverb ostar expresses movement toward the rising sun [this info taken from Gylfaginning which is the first section of a 13th century Icelandic prose book called Edda or Prose Edda – you will note the 13th century is far later than 700 AD], likewise the Old Norse austr, and probably an [Anglo Saxon] eastor and Gothic austr. In Latin the identical auster has been pushed round to the noonday quarter, the South. In the Edda a male being, a spirit of light, bears the name of austri, so a female one might have been called Austra; the High German and Saxon tribes seem on the contrary to have formed only an Ostara, Eastre (fem.), not Ostaro, Easra (masc.). And that may be the reason why the Norsemen said paskir and not austrur; they had never worshipped a goddess austra, or her cultus was already extinct.
"Ostara, Eastre seems therefore to have been the divinity of the radiant dawn, of upspringing light, a spectacle that brings joy and blessing, whose meaning could be easily adapted to the resurrection-day of the christian's God. Bonfires were lighted at Easter, and according to a popular belief of long standing, the moment the sun rises on Easter Sunday morning, he gives three joyful leaps, he dances for joy. Water drawn on Easter morning is like that at Christmas, holy and healing; here also heathen notions seems to have grafted themselves on great christian festivals. Maidens clothed in white, who at Easter, at the season of returning spring, show themselves in clefts of the roch and mountains, are suggestive of the ancient goddess." 
-Grimm. [emphasis mine] 
Alternate link: http://www.northvegr.org/lore/grimmst/013_11.php
And there you have it. This is a “Eostre = Ostara” proposal by Jacob Grimm, not a hard fact. He even admits that he is speculating about something Bede gave no detail about, and “of whose existence not a trace is left among other Germans.”
And by the way, the "Hrede" goddess... no evidence there either.

That doesn’t stop people from constructing elaborate scenarios from this information, however, and with that they boldly condemn billions. I find it no less ridiculous than claiming Australia was named after Ostara.

And still other, far more determined, people claim that if we go back far enough Ostara derives from Ishtar/Ashtoreth. There is no solid evidence for this whatsoever. All claims of this nature are purely speculative (even so, they are taught as fact.) If we can’t find proof for Eostre as a goddess let alone this Ostara, how on earth can we possibly have the proof that links her to Ishtar? The words sound alike, and that’s enough. But this appears to be what we call “false cognates.” They sound the same but in reality are not related.
It doesn’t help that these claims probably come from Alexander Hyslop, who we should all know was wholly unreliable. Certainly Jacob Grimm never intended his work to be so grossly misused.

This theoretical goddess bears no more influence on the name of Easter than Saturn’s Day has on the seventh-day Sabbath. Calling the Sabbath “Saturday” doesn’t make anyone any more a pagan than calling Pascha “Easter.” For all of the people who make such a huge fuss over something so simple as a name, don’t they know “Pentecost” is Helenistic Greek word, and the real name of the day is Sukkot? Using this same line of thinking with which they condemn a billion+ Christians, aren’t they also a pagan for keeping Pentecost? The Hellenistic Greeks were pagans! (I hope you understand I'm being facetious.)

Herbert Armstrong was well known for playing word games. He once claimed Mussolini was called “Il Duce” because “duce” is the Anglo-Saxon word for “demon.” When in reality, it is the Latin word for “commander,” and from this same word we get the English word “Duke.”
I used to play the same word games myself... until I stopped being afraid of the truth.

For anyone wanting more information about this, we recommend you read the following links on the subject. They are quite informative:

Is Easter Pagan? - YouTube video by Jimmy Akin
Where did Easter come from?
Eostre and Easter Customs (Yes, I am aware this is a pagan website. I put it here for balance.)
The Origin Easter - Pagan or Christian? (see p.2)
Is Easter a Pagan Festival?

From the evidence we have, we can be confident that the word Easter comes from the name of the month in which it fell, not from the name of a goddess. Eaosturmonath was likely shortened in the translation, as is common with long names, and eventually we get the English word Easter.


Herbert Armstrong taught that there was a dispute in the earliest years about whether to keep Passover or whether to adopt a pagan holiday. As we mentioned earlier, this is patently false!

Regardless of what happened in Germany hundreds of years afterwards, Pascha is most definitely not derived from a pagan holiday. No pagan holiday was involved in any sense. Nor was there any issue regarding abandoning the Old Covenant law. The issue was about the calendar and following after Judaism, not paganism or law. But all parties involved were observing one and the same Pascha. Not only is Herbert Armstrong’s claim untrue, but it is baseless. There are no reliable facts behind this claim whatsoever.

The idea of rabbits and eggs, although they are often found as fertility symbols in ancient religions, didn’t factor in to the Latin Pascha for a thousand years after Jesus died - after the Paschal festival had reached Germany, and after the Germanic peoples began successfully spreading out to the northwest.
But all of this doesn’t deter the ones who are blindly determined to condemn Easter and all who celebrate it. They take something that happened a thousand years after the fact, move it back in time to the first century (or rather to 2,000 BC), and blame the Catholics, and all Christians besides themselves, for all forms of things they are entirely innocent of.

Oddly enough, there is an ancient tradition among the Orthodox Greeks of boiling eggs and dying them red.
The tradition has many explanations, but none of them involve Germanic Goddesses. Although there is no definitive history on the origin of Easter Eggs, it may be possible that coloring Easter Eggs comes from the Greek Christians and not German pagans at all.

We now must turn and fend off some claims that get dangerously close to blasphemy.
Some of the true zealots hate the actual history of Easter so much that they would undermine the Deity of Christ in order to smear Easter. In a stellar example of “post hoc ergo propter hoc” (after this therefore because of this) there are many people who claim Easter (and even Christ Himself) is simply a hold-over from the worship of the ancient gods Mithra and Attis.

According to Edwin M. Yamauchi, PhD. who holds a doctorate in Mediterranean Studies from Brandeis University, taught at Miami University in Ohio for 35+ years, wrote over 17 books including the 578-page "Persia and the Bible", and in 1978 delivered a paper to the Second International Congress of Mithraic Studies (I only list this info to show that the guy knows his Mithra), there is a very high probability that Herbert Armstrong is flat wrong on his pagan origin of Easter. HWA always attributed Easter to pagan gods, but let’s hear from an actual historian.

About Mithra:
"Western Mithraism didn't exist until the mid-second century [AD]... too late to have influenced the development of first-century Christianity."
-Edwin Yamauchi. P.169
“…even though Mithras was a Persian god who was attested as early as the fourteenth century BC, we have almost no evidence of Mithraism in the sense of a mystery religion in the West until very late – too late to have influenced the beginnings of Christianity.”
-Edwin Yamauchi. P. 168
Strobel, Lee. The Case for the Real Jesus. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1987.
About Attis:
“… [Pierre] Lambrechts has demonstrated that the supposed ‘resurrection’ of Attis doesn’t appear until after AD 150 – more than a century after Jesus.”
-Edwin Yamauchi. P.177
 And about Adonis:
“Pierre Lambrechts  has shown that there are no indications of a resurrection in the early information we have about Adonis. While there are four texts that speak of his resurrection, they date from the second to the fourth century AD – long after Jesus.”
--Edwin Yamauchi. P.177
And about the common origin of all gods and goddesses which HWA often preached:
“Yes, there was a widespread view that there was a general, common mystery religion, but upon a closer examination of the sources, nobody believes that any longer.”
“These were quite different beliefs. In fact, by the mid-twentieth century, scholars had established that the sources used in these writings were far from satisfactory and the parallels were much too superficial.”
-Edwin Yamauchi. P.167
The fallacious claim by HWA is that since we see bunnies and eggs in the Easter decorations, then all of Easter must be pagan. That simply isn’t true. The fallacy is that Mithra and Attis are older than Easter, therefore Easter must come from them. This is what we call the “post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy; or “after this therefore because of this.” Nothing could be farther from the truth! Easter comes from Pascha, not paganism. And it would appear that paganism was far busier adopting Christian precepts in the decades after Christ than Christianity was busy adopting pagan precepts.

Regarding the bunnies and eggs, these were incorporated into Latin tradition sometime around 1,000 A.D., they do not in any way prove that Easter is pagan. If they offend, leave them out. If they're sin to you, they're sin to you. They are nothing to the overall celebration of Jesus the Christ.

I would very much like to point out that in Christianity these things are not objects of worship. They are not idols. No one bows before them, nor prays to them, nor considers them important to their faith or the worship of God in any way. No one sees them as fertility symbols. No one dedicates them to pagan goddesses. In fact, Armstrong had to spend a great deal of time and effort convincing people that these were fertility symbols in order to condemn them.
They are fun traditions for kids, and that’s all they are. To condemn a billion+ people over them seems a bit silly to me now that I have a better understanding of what Easter is.

In Armstrongism there is a terrible fear of anything not found in the Old Testament. Well, as I have pointed out elsewhere, Hanukkah is not in the Old Testament, yet there Jesus is keeping it. I think this fear we had drove us to put an improper weight on the verses that speak against idolatry, but we gave little weight to the verses that speak against condemnation. Knowing what I know now, I feel that is very sad.

Let us now return to the topic of timing and investigate further some specific details..


The Gentile church in Europe was of the opinion that Jewish reckoning of time, which could place the festival on any day of the week, was disruptive. Many Jews used a lunar calendar, began their days at sundown, and relied on calculations and the decisions of the Jewish leadership to determine years, seasons, months, and days - some of which were determined by sight originally.
The Romans on the other hand used a solar calendar, days began at midnight, weeks were not 7 days long, and had no such reliance on a priesthood or ties to a certain geographical area. All they wanted was a fixed and reliable date.
So, even though the Church in Asia claimed they received their traditions from the Apostles, who kept the 14th of Nisan Pascha as well as the Lord's Day on Sunday (REV. 1: 10), there is no clear command in the New Testament on when to observe Lent or Pascha. The details of timing were pure tradition. So the debate went on, and eventually the western opinion won out.

Try to keep in mind that the Apostles were Jewish converts living mainly during the time before the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. They didn’t have the calendar issues like the Gentiles did.
Also keep in mind that Jesus Himself changed the timing of Pascha. The Lord’s Supper is Passover, but it is not the Old Covenant Passover, and the timing is not according to law.
Unfortunately that is how Armstrongists view it - a matter of law. I feel this is the true root of the issue here. The two Covenants cannot be blended together. And the New Covenant cannot be interpreted through the lens of the Old, rather it is the other way around.

Some claim Easter is a celebration of the Spring equinox, but this is false. Easter is not on the Spring equinox; just like Christmas is not on the Winter equinox. It can’t quite be a celebration of the equinox if it isn’t on the equinox. Generally speaking, the 14th of Nisan is often closer to the Spring equinox than Easter is. Part of Rabbi Hilel II's reason for changing the Hebrew calendar was to make it easier to predict when the Paschal New Moon would fall before the Spring Equinox.
At any rate, the timing was not intended to celebrate the beginning of Spring, but the equinox was a reliable recurring guide for timing. Keep in mind, using the stellar bodies as timing devices is one of God's stated reasons for creating them as He did. So there's nothing at all wrong with it (GEN. 1: 14).

The rule since the 325 AD is: “Easter is observed on the Sunday after the first full moon on or after the day of the vernal equinox.” And that was chosen because the 14th of Nisan was impossible to determine with accuracy, yet it would keep the date near the 14th of Nisan.
You see, most people are blissfully unaware that, anciently, Passover was always on a full moon after the vernal equinox. Find that date, go up one Sunday and voila: Easter! Even if the Jews completely lost their ability to determine time, Easter would always be near the time when Jesus died.

Some may ask, "If that's true, then why isn't Passover always near Easter?" It was anciently, and still often is, but not always. Several calendars are involved now.

In the fourth century, a mere three decades after the date for Easter was set, the Jews under Rabi Hilel II changed the way they calculate the Hebrew calendar. They now use a mathematical model to determine the calendar, and by extension the holy days which rely on the calendar. Unfortunately, if you rely on the modern Jews to provide the Hebrew calendar, you're still not observing the Holy Days as Jesus did. (I'm not knocking the Jews. They did what they had to do. I'm addressing people who judge and condemn others over timing that they themselves get wrong.)
Not only that, but when the Council of Nicea was held and the timing of Easter established by the Bishops there, they were all under the Julian Calendar. Since that calendar was found to be flawed, Pope Gregory XIII declared a new and much more accurate calendar should be created. The West has been using that calendar since 1582. As an interesting bit of trivia, the Greek Orthodox Church still ties their reckoning of Pascha to the Julian calendar, hence the Catholic and Orthodox Easters are often on different weeks.

Some claim the Easter sunrise service is derived from the ancient pagan practice of welcoming the sun on the morning of the spring equinox, but this is false. We have ancient Christian documents as well as a Roman record from Pliny the Younger, showing Christians held sunrise services precisely because that is what they received from the Apostles and read in the Gospels about the timing of Jesus’ resurrection.

But if timing is so crucial to salvation, as Armstrongism teaches, let’s spend a minute on that and see if they get timing right.

We saw in the first part of this series that HWA’s timing of Passover is wrong, there is a bitter ongoing dispute over the correct timing of Passover if it is the 14th or the 15th, and the Night to Be Much Observed is more or less a made-up thing. So their timing isn’t any better than anyone else’s.
But did you know that for 40 years Herbert Armstrong (supposedly an Apostle taught directly by God) taught Pentecost falls on Monday. According to this reasoning, everyone who lived and died observing the wrong date/time were terrible sinners awaiting condemnation.
RedFox of Living Armstrongism, in the post “What Was WCG Before 1970 Like?” adds this:
“Around 1948-9 a controversy erupted in RCG. It has been described as traumatic. Anyone who disagreed with HWA's Monday Pentecost was cast out of the church, only to learn 25 years later that they were right.”
In Armstrongism, to be cast out of the church means eternal death. One cannot overstate the gravity of convicting people of an offense worthy of eternal death… only to completely about face. In 1974, Pentecost was changed to Sunday. Incidentally, this change in dating caused a huge split in the church and prompted Raymond Cole to establish the Church of God the Eternal. To this day they observe Pentecost on Monday, citing as authority HWA’s claims that God revealed the truth to him at the beginning. Both cannot be right.
Timing issues appear in other areas as well. The Church of the Great God calculates Pentecost differently in years when the First Day of Unleavened Bread falls on a weekly Sabbath. Hidden in this Pentecost conflict is a debate on when the Wave Sheaf offering occurred (LEV. 23: 11-15), and thus a dispute over the timing of Jesus' resurrection.

So why all of this confusion over such a “plain truth” as timing? If it’s so vital for salvation, why can’t even the people who say they are doing it right seem to get it right?
It’s because timing isn’t as important as they say! What matters is Jesus.

(I COR. 11: 25) …This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.

And what matters is what’s in your heart.

(I COR. 11: 27-31) 27 Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. 30 For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we would not be judged.

What would you suppose is in the heart of a person who would condemn another person over the timing of something which they themselves get wrong? My guess is it’s probably not the stuff that is pleasing to Christ. Good thing there’s still time to change the heart!


This really is the original question, isn’t it? This is the question that got the ball rolling early in the second century AD. Here we are today still asking it. I wonder if it’s worth the trouble for me to review it.

Frankly, it’s up to your faith and your relationship with God.
If your faith prefers to keep Passover with a church like the COG7 who invites all baptized Christians to their Lord’s Supper on the 14th of Nisan, then God bless you and I pray your observance is Spirit-filled and enriching. The Apostles did it, so there’s nothing wrong with it.
If your faith prefers to follow the western Gentile tradition and attend an Easter Sunday service – with or without rabbits and eggs – then God bless you and I pray your observance is Spirit-filled and enriching. The early Gentiles did it, Polycarp and Anicetus lived side-by-side through it, that’s how Christians have done it for 1,900 years, so there’s nothing wrong with it.

Just remember Jesus the Christ, and keep Him in your heart to purify it. Condemnation is not an option – towards yourself or others.

I’ve been told, "You can't refute the fact that the Bible does not teach the observance of Christmas and Easter."

Oh, but I can!
Jesus’ birth is very much in the Bible. Whether we call it “Christmas” or not, and regardless of what day was eventually settled on for the festival, the birth of Christ is very real, and besides His death and resurrection there has been no other day in the history of mankind that compares to the day on which He was born. Does the Bible command that we celebrate it? No. But it doesn’t say not to. (That’s for another study.)
But Pascha, on the other hand, it does teach. If we can get past these childish disputes over names and timing, we would see this plainly.

The Bible doesn't teach the observance of Thanksgiving for that matter. The Bible doesn't teach the observance of Hanukkah either - yet there Jesus is keeping it (JON. 10: 22). So what are we to say? Seems to me like these arguments are grasping at straws.

I’ve been told, “I only want to do what Jesus did.”

Then you can't refute the fact that Jesus kept Hanukkah (and the other Jewish festivals like Purim). So why don't you do those? This argument falls apart when we find the people who put such a high value on only doing what Jesus did are not actually doing what Jesus did.
Need I remind anyone that Jesus changed the timing of Pascha? Why then are a billion+ Christians, who fully trust in Jesus Christ as their personal Savior, condemned as pagans for doing what Jesus Himself did?
I’ll bet “doing what Jesus did” suddenly became a lot less important for some people who claim that’s all they want to do.


Easter is Pascha. Pascha is Easter.
Easter is an English word that comes from the High German name for the month of April, Ostarmonath. It does not come from the name of a goddess.
Easter is not pagan in origin, but began as a matter of desiring a reliable, set timing for the Lord’s Supper and the end of the Lenten fast that went with it - that doesn’t rely on the Jews to determine the timing.
Eggs were traditions among the Orthodox since who knows when and weren't introduced in the Latin west perhaps until after 1,000 A.D. They don’t even factor in. Even if they were pagan fertility symbols to remote cultures, we have no evidence these things came from the Germans, or that they were adopted into Christianity from pagans. They could have been innocent Spring symbols.
Armstrongists shouldn’t condemn seasonal symbols. A great many times I have seen cornucopias and other harmless items set out on tables as a symbol of harvest. The Bible is full of symbols. The bread and the wine are symbols. There is nothing inherently wrong with symbols.

So, whichever way your faith in God leads you to worship Him, I pray He purifies your heart and blesses you. I pray He leads to see that condemnation isn’t proper. Who would demand the law, yet ignore the many commands against condemnation? And I pray He leads you to further study on this topic, and a deeper understanding of the New Covenant in His blood.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Gracefully Free!

Here is a heart-warming story from a friend of ours here at ABD; this person goes by the name Gracefully Free. In an effort to reach out to those who are in need (believe me, we here at ABD understand what an emotional roller-coaster ride you are going through when you leave Armstrongism and our hearts go out to you), when we can we would like to share the stories of the people we have met who have stepped into the New Covenant. We've already shared our own stories, which you will find links to on the Categories page. Hopefully someone out there will be able to relate, and will find strength and peace in these stories.
And we just want to add - praise God you're free, Gracefully!

My story is not all that different than others. My mother died when I was young and my relationship with my father was never a close one and needless to say, his behavior made my ability to love and acknowledge love (by men in particular) less than optimum. But on the positive side, I grew up with siblings that have always been supportive and loving. I am very thankful for my brothers and sisters. I have decided long ago that I am not going to place blame on anyone other than myself for my mistakes and sins, and oh are there many! It would be very easy to say that I've done bad things because of how I was raised, because of my father's actions or because of the church I was raised in. But ultimately, it comes down to me being weak...full of pride...sinful, yes- just a woman in need of God's grace.

As far as having a relationship with God while growing up? It was nonexistent. Yes, I knew of God, but I did not have a real relationship with Him until literally just a few months ago, despite reading the bible and going to church all my life. The church I attended, along with my family, was by no means traditional. Most of the emphasis was placed on keeping the laws and holy days of the old testament while prohibiting any association with traditional holidays and observances, such as Christmas and Easter. Yes, the new testament was included in their teaching, but the belief was that the new testament and Jesus Christ came so that we can be forgiven when we mess up in regards to trying to observe the old testament laws, because as we all know, we're only human and we're most definitely going to mess up and sin. I grew up observing the 7th day Sabbath. But what's interesting is that even though we said we observed the Sabbath, it was not kept the way the Hebrews did in bible, it was kept the way Herbert W. Armstrong interpreted it to be kept and that goes along with all the teachings we were being taught. I've recently been learning that most of those beliefs were actually made up by Herbert W. Armstrong as his interpretation of scripture, as well as a combination of Seventh-day Adventism, Jehovah Witness and Mormon influences. The beliefs were not from or of God and certainly did not follow what the bible teaches. My belief system was pharisaical to say the least. I never really shared my beliefs with anyone, because of my fear of being made fun of when I was younger. Then, as I grew into an adult, I actually pitied people outside of the church because they didn't know the "biblical truths" that we knew, they weren't special like we were. We were led to believe we were a chosen people who were the only ones to know God's truth, we were His saints. I had no love for others, for myself, or for God and ultimately, I walked away from it all.

I ran as fast as I could in the opposite direction. I didn't want anything to do with God. To me, God represented nothing but rules, laws and fear. So, I thought by going in the opposite direction of ALL religion, I would be able to be free of the fear, I thought I would be free to live a good life without God in the way. I was going to finally have fun!

So after a few years of trying to run away and do my own thing, I knew something was missing. Many times, I thought of going back. It was what I knew and understood, but something held me back from actually stepping foot back in that church. I felt myself falling into a deep depression over the confusion I was going through. I had a hard time finding a reason to keep going. I knew my health was not good, I received a diagnosis of having an autoimmune disease (possibly lupus) and I just wanted to let go of everything. My physical body was run down and tired of the battle. I thought to myself, well "this is not the good life I anticipated." My family was not aware of my feelings for the most part, there were a few cries for help, but mostly, I tried to keep my weaknesses hidden. Even my husband was not aware of my inner distress. Looking back, I realize that my spiritual turmoil was causing my body to fall apart. I'm an RN and tend to view health with a more medical perspective, but I can say in my case, lack of God in my life was slowly killing me.

I knew something had to change or my life would end, both physically and spiritually. I began to read and study like my life depended on it (which it did). And I truly believe that my broken self cried out for a lifeline and God heard my silent prayers for help. In my darkness, my heart knew I needed God in my life. I had a God shaped hole in me. It came down to me believing that our great God has a great love for me. For me, a sinner! Who would have thought it was possible? For Him being as magnificent as He is.... to love little ol' me! What was so hard to believe before suddenly came into clear focus. God heard me and had compassion on me. I finally believed Him and gave my struggles over to Him. I am the adopted daughter of the most high King, it exhilarated me and filled me with wonder and the desire to seek Him in all aspects of my life. I decided I was no longer going to TRY to love Him out of fear. I love Him because He loved me first, after all, He died for me.

I read an analogy recently regarding someone trying to keep the old testament laws. Imagine Jesus Christ is sitting in a boat and we're in the water, picture the water as being the law. We're in the water trying to stay afloat, swimming, treading water, eventually tiring to the point where we're about to drown. Now imagine Christ pulling us into the boat with him, safe. Why would we want to jump back into the water? But that's what we're doing by trying to keep laws and observances that were established before Christ came to save us.

This last Sunday, at the awesome church I now attend, people got up with cardboard testimonies. It was very moving and inspiring to see how God has transformed people's lives. Some may say that God does not perform miracles today and I say they're wrong. There has been a miracle in my life, which is the change of my heart. It has not come from my doing, I give all credit to Him. I was lost, but am now found. I was initially shocked at the degree that I've found myself searching and reaching for Him. I'm completely thirsty for His ways. He is now and will forever be my compass. I find myself running towards Him in all that I do, the bible is my guidebook. I want nothing more than to live my life according to His desire. I know without a doubt that the Holy Spirit is working within me and helping me, guiding me. His love for us (me) is perfect and beautiful. I am sharing my story because I want others to know of Him and His great love as well. It's completely life changing. I want to shout from the rooftops how amazing it is.

I want to thank those who have been supportive of me throughout these last few years. First and foremost, My husband, who must have seen something good in me despite my inability to see it. I know he's been pulling for me through his own prayers for quite a while. He remained strong and convicted in his faith while I struggled with doubts and fears. I want to thank the pastors and staff at [the community church were I attend], without a doubt, they are being used by God to spread His gospel through teachings that are sound and biblical. I want to thank [a very close friend], I shared my story and tears with her a few weeks ago, I believe that telling her and others my past is helping me to heal. And I would also like to thank my brothers and sisters, not all of them will be able to see this note because I do not wish to offend them (since they're still attending the church I grew up in). Every single one of them have beautiful hearts and have taught me that family really does stick together. Someday, I hope we're all able to celebrate God's love together. I also need to mention a certain source in my thanks that has been a huge help through my journey of learning the truth about my past beliefs. The website/blog is called "AS BEREANS DID" The writers on this site are insightful and are a huge support for those leaving this particular religion- (any of the Church of God organizations/splinters). Tons of information, I have visited the site almost daily for the past month.

Happy Easter everyone!

One of my favorite songs these days is by Francesca Battistelli, called Beautiful, Beautiful. The words depict my thoughts and feelings almost exactly.

Don’t know how it is You looked at me
And saw the person that I could be
Awakening my heart
Breaking through the dark
Suddenly Your grace

Like sunlight burning at midnight
Making my life something so
Beautiful, beautiful
Mercy reaching to save me
All that I need
You are so
Beautiful, beautiful

Now there’s a joy inside I can’t contain
But even perfect days can end in rain
And though it’s pouring down
I see You through the clouds
Shining on my face


I have come undone
But I have just begun
Changing by Your grace

Thursday, April 8, 2010

God’s Perfect Solution

I don’t mean to be a one note song, but I get on the net and these guys just seem to be popping up everywhere. I was listening to this advocate of ‘The Law” He was preaching about how the people in the world hate God so much that there will only be a handful who will come to God without going through a horrific experience of horror, and of course this is because God is only calling a few, leaving the majority destined for the meat grinder; “They hate God’s laws particularly the Sabbath” he says, and goes on to talk about how the law keepers that are part of his group alone shall be saved. Sound familiar.

It’s interesting how much agreement some of these people have with the Muslims, and many of their arguments are similar. Some of them are in denial of the pre-existence of Jesus; both find it impossible to accept anything but a believer submitted in prostration to a fearsome God of wrath which conflicts sharply with a self sacrificing God who is love 1Jn 4:8, Jn3:16.

Neither can conceive of anything other than a law bound world of beaten to submission populations finally worn down by war and terror where only a handful find the full grace of God by their law keeping. Neither can grasp the concept that God creates even the nature of man, and he promises to change that nature so that man no longer requires intimidating threats and weighty sanctions to keep compressed and bottled up a capability for self seeking avarice.

I have an analogy from everyday life, so it’s a little crude, so I ask your pardon, but it’s one I see every day. I have dogs, and I can testify that no law will make my dogs stop barking at the neighbors. They know I don’t like them doing that and sometimes they’re trying to bark yet I’m staring at them so they try not to. It’s funny to see them convulsing with the bark that’s trying to escape while they struggle to keep their mouths shut. Dogs have some revolting predispositions, they sniff each other’s behinds and worse yet, I picked one up when it was younger and the stink had me gagging in seconds. The dog had excrement smeared all over her face; she had been having an evening snack. Now days I occasionally have to dispose of a dried artifact or two that they’ve carried into the house to chew on. God gave dogs their nature, as revolting as it sometimes is. Maybe there’s something to be learned from that.

The graphic example I provided, I felt necessary to include to create an image in our minds about how human nature must appear to God; and to point to the fact that dogs follow the nature of dogs, cats follow the nature of cats etc. It’s a very basic and simple reality.

Now the perfect solution to my dog problem would be to change their nature, but I can’t do this; but if I could, it would be the logical thing to do. It would save me a whole lot of problems. All my exasperated expressions of frustration and condemnation of their behavior is a pointless exercise in futility.

The same thing goes for human beings. The preacher can roll his eyes, condemning humanity with sighs of exasperation, rattling on about the shamefulness of human behavior, but it will change nothing, just as the Law of Commandments never really changed anything. Changing the nature of man is the logical solution. The history of Israel and the law demonstrate that man can’t change his own nature; so if it is to be change, God must do it. It would be illogical for God to expect something beyond human capability. To believe God expects such a thing would imply that God is unjust for expecting man to change his own nature, illogical for thinking he can or too weak to do it himself, none of which are true.

God gave man their nature in the first place, Rom 8:20 (YLT)”for to vanity was the creation made subject--not of its will, but because of Him who did subject it --in hope.”

The word translated ‘vanity’ has broader meaning then the word vanity alone (G3153 mataiotes mat-ah-yot'-ace from G3152; inutility; figuratively, transientness; morally, depravity:--vanity.)

I think that might describe human nature, but God subjected man to the nature of the flesh. God did it for a purpose, and I’d say that it is a case of aversion therapy. Those who repent and come to Jesus are those who are sick of the nature we possess, and reach out for a solution; one which he promises to provide. God will provide a new nature.

When we fully receive his promise, because of our experience, we will forever be thankful for God’s gift of a holy nature i.e. the divine nature. 2Pe1:3 His divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness. 4Through these he has given us his very great and precious promises, so that through them you may participate in the divine nature and escape the corruption in the world caused by evil desires.

So as to end on where I started; when I listen to advocates of the law preach; I’m hearing a lot of what distills down to: “those evil rotten disgusting human beings in this depraved, horrible, evil world of sin, selfishness, greed and debauchery; God is going to do something about it; he’s going to destroy them; and the few that remain will be terrified into obedience.” I think God has a better solution. It’s the logical solution. He’s going to simply create a new nature.



It is important that you understand; Everything on this blog is based on the current understanding of each author. Never take anyone's word for it, always prove it for yourself, it is your responsibility. You cannot ride someone else's coattail into the Kingdom.

Acts 17:11